Solar imaging cameras need to meet specific requirements to work well with different telescopes. Unlike deep-sky imaging, where long exposures are the norm, solar imaging requires high-speed cameras capable of capturing many frames per second. This is because the atmosphere is constantly shifting, and capturing a large number of frames allows for stacking the best images to achieve better clarity and detail.
One of the key factors in selecting a solar camera is pixel size. The relationship between pixel size and telescope focal ratio plays a major role in how well the camera resolves details. This is why matching the camera’s pixel size to the focal ratio of the telescope is important. For an F7 telescope, the optimal pixel size is around 1.56 microns. Cameras with pixels too large or too small can result in loss of detail or unnecessary oversampling.
The type of sensor is also important. Most solar imagers use monochrome sensors because they provide higher resolution and better contrast compared to color sensors. While color cameras can be used, they often do not produce the same level of detail as their monochrome counterparts. Monochrome cameras allow for better control over the imaging process, and color can be added later in post-processing.
Another consideration is frame rate. Higher frame rates allow for more images to be captured in a short amount of time, increasing the chances of getting sharp images despite atmospheric turbulence. Faster cameras are often preferred because they can capture fleeting moments of perfect seeing conditions.
Beyond sensor type and pixel size, the field of view is another critical factor. Some cameras have a smaller field of view, which means they may not be able to capture the entire solar disc in one frame. This is not necessarily a problem, as some astrophotographers prefer to capture multiple images and stitch them together into a mosaic. However, for those who want to capture the whole disc in one shot, choosing a camera with a larger sensor can be beneficial.
Cooling is another aspect that sometimes comes up in astrophotography discussions, but it is less relevant for solar imaging. Unlike deep-sky imaging, where long exposures lead to sensor heating and noise buildup, solar imaging is done with short exposures, so cooling is not as critical.
In terms of brands and models, there are several options available that cater to solar imaging enthusiasts. ZWO and QHYCCD are two of the most popular brands, offering a wide range of cameras with different sensor sizes and pixel resolutions. Player One Astronomy has also entered the market with cameras optimized for solar and planetary imaging. These brands provide a variety of options that can fit different budgets and imaging needs.
For those looking to get started with solar imaging or upgrade their existing setup, there are a few models that stand out. Cameras with the Sony IMX 290, IMX 462, IMX 178, and IMX 174 sensors are commonly used by solar imagers due to their high frame rates and good pixel sizes for different telescope configurations. The IMX 533 is another option that offers flexibility in different imaging conditions.
Mark Johnston, also known as azastroguy, recently put out a video where he breaks down the best cameras for solar imaging with an F7 telescope. He gets this question a lot, probably because F7 refractors are some of the most common telescopes out there. The idea behind the video is to compare different cameras and see which one delivers the best results when paired with an F7 scope.
He starts by quickly going over the basics of solar imaging. You can get started with solar imaging pretty easily by adding a broadband solar filter to the objective or swapping out your normal diagonal for a Herschel wedge. But once you have that setup, you still need to figure out which camera is going to give you the best results.
In past videos, he’s talked about how pixel size needs to match up well with the focal ratio of your telescope to get the best image quality. In previous tests, he found that the IMX 290 was the best match for F7 telescopes, but at the time, he didn’t have an IMX 178 to compare it with. This time around, he does, so the video is all about testing these two cameras to see which one comes out on top.
For people who like the technical details, he mentions that the ideal pixel size for an F7 telescope is 1.56 microns. The further you get from that number, the more you compromise image quality. He’s not going into the math this time, but if you’re interested in that part, you can check out his previous videos.
The main cameras he’s testing are the IMX 290 and the IMX 178. He groups the IMX 290 with the IMX 462 since they’re basically the same sensor, with only small improvements in the 462. He also briefly mentions the IMX 678M, which is another possible option, but he doesn’t have one to test. In addition to these, he throws in a couple of other popular choices just to give a full comparison. The IMX 174 is widely used for solar imaging and works well for people using a quark with an F7 refractor since it changes the focal ratio to F30. There’s also the IMX 533M, which is a versatile camera that does a decent job at F7 but really shines when used at bin 2 with an F30 setup.
One of the key points he makes is that pixel match with the telescope’s focal ratio is more important than resolution or frames per second. He also talks about whether you want to capture a full solar disc in one shot or if you’re okay with stitching together multiple images to create a mosaic. This depends on your telescope’s aperture. Using his Lunt 100 MT telescope, he found that to get a full solar disc, it would take two images from the IMX 178, six from the IMX 290, or just one from the IMX 533 or IMX 174. Smaller aperture telescopes will fit more of the solar disc in a single shot, so that’s something to consider.
For the tests, he took multiple images with all the cameras under different seeing conditions. He used two different F7 refractors: the Lunt 100 MT and the TEC 160F. This way, he could get a solid comparison across different scenarios.
One important point he makes is that you always want to use a monochrome camera for solar imaging. He shows an example of a color camera, the ZWO 715 MC, which actually has an excellent pixel match for F7 at 1.45 microns, but the images don’t look nearly as good compared to a monochrome camera. If you want color, you can always add it in post-processing using software like Affinity Photo or Photoshop.
After showing a series of comparison images, he gives his final thoughts. The best camera for F7 solar imaging is the IMX 290M or the IMX 462M. The IMX 178M is a close second, and if you want a larger field of view, it might be the better option for you. He also mentions that the performance rankings were the same whether he was shooting in broadband or hydrogen-alpha.
Address:
1855 S Ingram Mill Rd
STE# 201
Springfield, Mo 65804
Phone: 1-844-277-3386
Fax: 417-429-2935
E-Mail: hello@scopetrader.com